The Wealth of Nations opens with a fundamental question: what determines how richly a nation supplies its people with necessities and conveniences? Smith's answer, set out in the Introduction, is that it depends on the skill with which labour is applied and on the proportion of productive to unproductive workers. This frames the whole inquiry as an investigation into productive powers rather than treasure.
Book I establishes the division of labour as the chief source of improvement. The pin-factory example, where ten poorly equipped men produce upwards of forty-eight thousand pins a day by dividing the work into eighteen distinct operations, makes concrete what specialisation achieves. Chapter II then explains why division of labour arises: not from any wise plan but from the human propensity to truck, barter, and exchange. Self-interest motivates every party to a bargain; the brewer and baker serve their customers not from benevolence but from regard to their own advantage. Books I and II continue with the theory of wages, profit, rent, the real and nominal price of commodities, and the role of capital stock in setting productive labour to work.
Book III turns historical. Smith traces how Europe, after the fall of Rome, developed in a sequence that inverted the natural order: towns and commerce flourished while agriculture, which he considers the foundation, was neglected. The interests of merchants and manufacturers shaped policy to favour themselves, often at the expense of both landlords and labourers.
Book IV is the sustained critique of mercantilism. Smith argues that the mercantile system, built on the belief that national wealth is gold and silver, and that a trade surplus is the measure of prosperity, rests on a confusion. It produced a web of monopolies, import prohibitions, and colonial exploitation that enriched a few and impoverished the rest. Here Smith introduces the invisible hand: an individual who prefers domestic industry for security intends only private gain yet is led, as in many other cases, by an invisible hand to promote an end no part of his intention, the growth of national output. He also attacks the physiocratic alternative, which made agriculture alone productive, as an opposite error.
Book V closes the argument with the proper role of the sovereign: defence, justice, and those public works and institutions (roads, bridges, education) that the market will not provide because their profit cannot be captured privately. Smith here allows a significant scope for public provision but insists that expenses be matched to revenues and that the burden of public debt, already grave in 1776, is a danger to long-run prosperity. The work as a whole is less a simple apology for laissez-faire than a comprehensive account of how productive forces interact with institutions, incentives, and history.